﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 僥倖還有常識這回事</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2010/05/01/1639/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2010/05/01/1639</link>
	<description>以前的事，無人記念；將來的事，後來的人也不追憶。</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2010/05/01/1639/comment-page-1#comment-281065</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 21:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/?p=1639#comment-281065</guid>
		<description>蘋果: 民建聯葛珮帆則拒絕回應林彬事件，又指節目只訪問民建聯成員是「順理成章」，「民建聯特約贊助嘅節目，當然就係搵番民建聯啲議員」。 http://goo.gl/j7ls &lt;--葛小姐好誠實啊! 原來特約節目, 可以指定主持、嘉賓! 抵買!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>蘋果: 民建聯葛珮帆則拒絕回應林彬事件，又指節目只訪問民建聯成員是「順理成章」，「民建聯特約贊助嘅節目，當然就係搵番民建聯啲議員」。 <a href="http://goo.gl/j7ls" rel="nofollow">http://goo.gl/j7ls</a> <&#8211;葛小姐好誠實啊! 原來特約節目, 可以指定主持、嘉賓! 抵買!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2010/05/01/1639/comment-page-1#comment-281063</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 12:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/?p=1639#comment-281063</guid>
		<description>佢將僥倖理解作好彩；成功非僥倖，即係成功唔係好彩。咁囉。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>佢將僥倖理解作好彩；成功非僥倖，即係成功唔係好彩。咁囉。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 陳牛</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2010/05/01/1639/comment-page-1#comment-281059</link>
		<dc:creator>陳牛</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 10:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/?p=1639#comment-281059</guid>
		<description>僥倖這個詞我覺得林夕用錯了</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>僥倖這個詞我覺得林夕用錯了</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention 僥倖還有常識這回事 &#124; Just a Sidekick…… -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2010/05/01/1639/comment-page-1#comment-281058</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention 僥倖還有常識這回事 &#124; Just a Sidekick…… -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 03:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/?p=1639#comment-281058</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by sidekick, sidekick, 李學斌 / lxb / ابن السب, 黃老邪, superexcuser and others. superexcuser said: RT @sidekickick: 僥倖還有常識這回事 http://bit.ly/cKeIfv [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by sidekick, sidekick, 李學斌 / lxb / ابن السب, 黃老邪, superexcuser and others. superexcuser said: RT @sidekickick: 僥倖還有常識這回事 <a href="http://bit.ly/cKeIfv" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cKeIfv</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

