﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 他們的有色眼鏡</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077</link>
	<description>以前的事，無人記念；將來的事，後來的人也不追憶。</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257669</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257669</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-257261&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;hystericireul on 17/7/2007 at 3:19 pm said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

這票人只要看見陽具、裸體便大呼不雅要拉要鎖，只會貽笑大方。&lt;/blockquote&gt;

你這麼睇高他們呀, 他們是只要看到柱狀物, 即會聯想到勃起的陽具, 見到一對對的球狀物, 即聯想起女士的乳房的(戴上了)有&quot;色&quot;(眼鏡)之士呢。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-257261" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>hystericireul on 17/7/2007 at 3:19 pm said:</em></a></p>
<p>這票人只要看見陽具、裸體便大呼不雅要拉要鎖，只會貽笑大方。</p></blockquote>
<p>你這麼睇高他們呀, 他們是只要看到柱狀物, 即會聯想到勃起的陽具, 見到一對對的球狀物, 即聯想起女士的乳房的(戴上了)有&#8221;色&#8221;(眼鏡)之士呢。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257352</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257352</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-257335&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kli on 18/7/2007 at 7:14 am said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

洪金寶在一套港產片都畫過... 係畫一隻獅子，仲似過狗狗。 :idea:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

好記性!  :idea: 
我都好似睇過, 不過唔記得係洪金寶, 定係類似精裝追女仔o個類戲~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-257335" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>Kli on 18/7/2007 at 7:14 am said:</em></a></p>
<p>洪金寶在一套港產片都畫過&#8230; 係畫一隻獅子，仲似過狗狗。 <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_idea.gif' alt=':idea:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
<p>好記性!  <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_idea.gif' alt=':idea:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
我都好似睇過, 不過唔記得係洪金寶, 定係類似精裝追女仔o個類戲~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hystericireul</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257346</link>
		<dc:creator>hystericireul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257346</guid>
		<description>其實仲有一個問題

就算作者 (畫家) 真係畫裸體，係咪就自動代表不雅先~

村上春樹本挪威的森林一樣好多性愛描寫，但係佢係有主旨咁去表達呢d性愛，而唔係純粹為挑起讀者既情欲去寫，咁其實一樣唔可以話係不雅。

你話報紙風月版果d，擺明係教你召妓同挑起性欲為目的，呢d似乎更加值得「不雅」既稱號......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>其實仲有一個問題</p>
<p>就算作者 (畫家) 真係畫裸體，係咪就自動代表不雅先~</p>
<p>村上春樹本挪威的森林一樣好多性愛描寫，但係佢係有主旨咁去表達呢d性愛，而唔係純粹為挑起讀者既情欲去寫，咁其實一樣唔可以話係不雅。</p>
<p>你話報紙風月版果d，擺明係教你召妓同挑起性欲為目的，呢d似乎更加值得「不雅」既稱號&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kli</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257335</link>
		<dc:creator>Kli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257335</guid>
		<description>洪金寶在一套港產片都畫過... 係畫一隻獅子，仲似過狗狗。 :idea:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>洪金寶在一套港產片都畫過&#8230; 係畫一隻獅子，仲似過狗狗。 <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_idea.gif' alt=':idea:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257297</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257297</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-257272&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;小心 on 17/7/2007 at 5:40 pm said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

我&quot;立&quot;一&quot;立&quot;第一幅我覺得係裸體..仲係一個身材吾好既女人tim..&lt;/blockquote&gt;
都是這句:
這跟作家的畫功有關, 但跟作者的身材冇關! :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-257272" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>小心 on 17/7/2007 at 5:40 pm said:</em></a></p>
<p>我&#8221;立&#8221;一&#8221;立&#8221;第一幅我覺得係裸體..仲係一個身材吾好既女人tim..</p></blockquote>
<p>都是這句:<br />
這跟作家的畫功有關, 但跟作者的身材冇關! :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257296</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257296</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-257261&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;hystericireul on 17/7/2007 at 3:19 pm said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

放心讓他們出醜，最終他們自己會變得毫無威權可言。&lt;/blockquote&gt;
希望有這樣的一天......  :eek:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-257261" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>hystericireul on 17/7/2007 at 3:19 pm said:</em></a></p>
<p>放心讓他們出醜，最終他們自己會變得毫無威權可言。</p></blockquote>
<p>希望有這樣的一天&#8230;&#8230;  <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_smile.gif' alt=':eek:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 小心</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257272</link>
		<dc:creator>小心</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257272</guid>
		<description>我&quot;立&quot;一&quot;立&quot;第一幅我覺得係裸體..仲係一個身材吾好既女人tim..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我&#8221;立&#8221;一&#8221;立&#8221;第一幅我覺得係裸體..仲係一個身材吾好既女人tim..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hystericireul</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257261</link>
		<dc:creator>hystericireul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257261</guid>
		<description>由大衛像到古代春宮圖到中大學生報，淫審處的公信力不斷下降。

這票人只要看見陽具、裸體便大呼不雅要拉要鎖，只會貽笑大方。

放心讓他們出醜，最終他們自己會變得毫無威權可言。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>由大衛像到古代春宮圖到中大學生報，淫審處的公信力不斷下降。</p>
<p>這票人只要看見陽具、裸體便大呼不雅要拉要鎖，只會貽笑大方。</p>
<p>放心讓他們出醜，最終他們自己會變得毫無威權可言。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 查斯特</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257149</link>
		<dc:creator>查斯特</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257149</guid>
		<description>沒有辦法，淫審處咁少人每日處理咁&quot;多&quot;cases，自然戴開有色眼鏡。

&quot;審裁處的辦公室就那麼幾個職員，一個櫃台，一切文書往來就由姓何職員來處理，法官來來去去就是區士顯，每天不停地看二類三類的物品，以作評級（實在是厭惡性工作）。&quot;
http://www.inmediahk.net/public/article?item_id=243468&amp;group_id=178</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>沒有辦法，淫審處咁少人每日處理咁&#8221;多&#8221;cases，自然戴開有色眼鏡。</p>
<p>&#8220;審裁處的辦公室就那麼幾個職員，一個櫃台，一切文書往來就由姓何職員來處理，法官來來去去就是區士顯，每天不停地看二類三類的物品，以作評級（實在是厭惡性工作）。&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.inmediahk.net/public/article?item_id=243468&#038;group_id=178" rel="nofollow">http://www.inmediahk.net/public/article?item_id=243468&#038;group_id=178</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257107</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257107</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-257083&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;遙 on 16/7/2007 at 9:45 am said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

唔知點解，我對第一幅有遐想－點解呢條友d身材咁差！&lt;/blockquote&gt;
haha~
這個嘛~
同作者o既畫功有關, 但同作者o既身材就冇關! 
:p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-257083" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>遙 on 16/7/2007 at 9:45 am said:</em></a></p>
<p>唔知點解，我對第一幅有遐想－點解呢條友d身材咁差！</p></blockquote>
<p>haha~<br />
這個嘛~<br />
同作者o既畫功有關, 但同作者o既身材就冇關!<br />
:p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257106</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257106</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-257081&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;WiNG on 16/7/2007 at 9:00 am said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

事情不應一眼睇過而隨意話人「甚麼色情之類」的東西，反映了香港人的角度偏向保守。&lt;/blockquote&gt;

最近, 淫審判貼在inmedia的繭術照是不雅, 但對於報紙風雨版等真正色情物事, 一是判一級, 一是不受理, 及處理中, 我覺得好發神經.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-257081" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>WiNG on 16/7/2007 at 9:00 am said:</em></a></p>
<p>事情不應一眼睇過而隨意話人「甚麼色情之類」的東西，反映了香港人的角度偏向保守。</p></blockquote>
<p>最近, 淫審判貼在inmedia的繭術照是不雅, 但對於報紙風雨版等真正色情物事, 一是判一級, 一是不受理, 及處理中, 我覺得好發神經.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257105</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257105</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-257061&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;arthurson on 16/7/2007 at 4:50 am said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

講下無謂野先
去sidekick.com,入面有個sidekick電話,或者你可以叫代理比部你玩下喎.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

以前blog 過呢件事兩次.
聽講制式不同, 香港用不到的.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-257061" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>arthurson on 16/7/2007 at 4:50 am said:</em></a></p>
<p>講下無謂野先<br />
去sidekick.com,入面有個sidekick電話,或者你可以叫代理比部你玩下喎.</p></blockquote>
<p>以前blog 過呢件事兩次.<br />
聽講制式不同, 香港用不到的.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257104</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257104</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-257057&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;arthurson on 16/7/2007 at 4:01 am said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

我覺得用呢兩張相就去抽淫審處水(黃世柒既口頭嬋), 個說服力又差左少少既, 可能又有第三張相, 話呢張真係裸體相呢?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

好怕&quot;抽水&quot;呢兩個字. 
我唔認為係抽緊淫審水.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-257057" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>arthurson on 16/7/2007 at 4:01 am said:</em></a></p>
<p>我覺得用呢兩張相就去抽淫審處水(黃世柒既口頭嬋), 個說服力又差左少少既, 可能又有第三張相, 話呢張真係裸體相呢?</p></blockquote>
<p>好怕&#8221;抽水&#8221;呢兩個字.<br />
我唔認為係抽緊淫審水.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 遙</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257083</link>
		<dc:creator>遙</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257083</guid>
		<description>唔知點解，我對第一幅有遐想－點解呢條友d身材咁差！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>唔知點解，我對第一幅有遐想－點解呢條友d身材咁差！</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WiNG</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257081</link>
		<dc:creator>WiNG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257081</guid>
		<description>事情不應一眼睇過而隨意話人「甚麼色情之類」的東西，反映了香港人的角度偏向保守。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>事情不應一眼睇過而隨意話人「甚麼色情之類」的東西，反映了香港人的角度偏向保守。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthurson</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257061</link>
		<dc:creator>arthurson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257061</guid>
		<description>講下無謂野先
去sidekick.com,入面有個sidekick電話,或者你可以叫代理比部你玩下喎.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>講下無謂野先<br />
去sidekick.com,入面有個sidekick電話,或者你可以叫代理比部你玩下喎.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthurson</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/comment-page-1#comment-257057</link>
		<dc:creator>arthurson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/07/16/1077/#comment-257057</guid>
		<description>我覺得用呢兩張相就去抽淫審處水(黃世柒既口頭嬋), 個說服力又差左少少既, 可能又有第三張相, 話呢張真係裸體相呢?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我覺得用呢兩張相就去抽淫審處水(黃世柒既口頭嬋), 個說服力又差左少少既, 可能又有第三張相, 話呢張真係裸體相呢?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

