Comments on: 徘徊在怕醜又唔知醜之間 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001 以前的事，無人記念；將來的事，後來的人也不追憶。 Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-249026 sidekick Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:50:26 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-249026 tong, 是啊~ 其實唔止"好看一點", 而係"好看好多", 你說得對! :) tong,
是啊~ 其實唔止”好看一點”, 而係”好看好多”, 你說得對! :)

]]> By: tong http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-249009 tong Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:44:34 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-249009 <blockquote>sidekick跟阿hang 真人應該比那張照片好看一點!</blockquote> 真人是真的真的比照片好看.

sidekick跟阿hang 真人應該比那張照片好看一點!

真人是真的真的比照片好看.

]]> By: Just a Sidekick…… » Blog Archive » 愛“似”周星馳 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-249036 Just a Sidekick…… » Blog Archive » 愛“似”周星馳 Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:24:01 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-249036 [...] 寫完“徘徊在怕醜又唔知醜之間”後，有朋友叫我不如放張好照片上 blog“平反”一下，我說不用啦！ 嘿！不知這個小玩意，是否有“平反”之效呢？:p 看！我都頗具明星相嘛，有 76% 像松浦亞彌、72% 像李孝利，更有70% 像周星馳！ 我覺得嘛…… 照相片看……. 我最似…… 最似－－ 周星馳！ [...] [...] 寫完“徘徊在怕醜又唔知醜之間”後，有朋友叫我不如放張好照片上 blog“平反”一下，我說不用啦！ 嘿！不知這個小玩意，是否有“平反”之效呢？:p 看！我都頗具明星相嘛，有 76% 像松浦亞彌、72% 像李孝利，更有70% 像周星馳！ 我覺得嘛…… 照相片看……. 我最似…… 最似－－ 周星馳！ [...]

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-248299 sidekick Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:34:29 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-248299 <blockquote><a href="#comment-248205" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>Stannum on 9/4/2007 at 4:29 pm said:</em></a> 一係改用一幅訪問全版 thumbnail 仲好啦﹗</blockquote> 上一篇已用了, 這篇就是想說那幾張照片嘛~ 而家咁細張, 應該ok 卦?

Stannum on 9/4/2007 at 4:29 pm said:

一係改用一幅訪問全版 thumbnail 仲好啦﹗

上一篇已用了, 這篇就是想說那幾張照片嘛~
而家咁細張, 應該ok 卦?

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-248297 sidekick Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:32:54 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-248297 <blockquote><a href="#comment-248148" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>天佑 on 9/4/2007 at 12:08 pm said:</em></a> 一直不在這篇文章留言，因為實在不知說些什麼話好，妳那張相片固之然影得不好，阿 Hang 那張就更不濟，影得好像一個阿伯。</blockquote> 見到大家咁講反而放心好多, 起碼證明sidekick跟阿hang 真人應該比那張照片好看一點! :)

天佑 on 9/4/2007 at 12:08 pm said:

一直不在這篇文章留言，因為實在不知說些什麼話好，妳那張相片固之然影得不好，阿 Hang 那張就更不濟，影得好像一個阿伯。

見到大家咁講反而放心好多, 起碼證明sidekick跟阿hang 真人應該比那張照片好看一點! :)

]]> By: Stannum http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-248205 Stannum Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:29:04 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-248205 <blockquote><a href="#comment-248043" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>sidekick on 9/4/2007 at 3:16 am said:</em></a> 不如我再整細d 張相啦, 好冇?</blockquote> 一係改用一幅訪問全版 thumbnail 仲好啦﹗

sidekick on 9/4/2007 at 3:16 am said:

不如我再整細d 張相啦, 好冇?

一係改用一幅訪問全版 thumbnail 仲好啦﹗

]]> By: 天佑 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-248148 天佑 Mon, 09 Apr 2007 04:08:02 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-248148 一直不在這篇文章留言，因為實在不知說些什麼話好，妳那張相片固之然影得不好，阿 Hang 那張就更不濟，影得好像一個阿伯。 一直不在這篇文章留言，因為實在不知說些什麼話好，妳那張相片固之然影得不好，阿 Hang 那張就更不濟，影得好像一個阿伯。

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-248043 sidekick Sun, 08 Apr 2007 19:16:56 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-248043 hang, 你睇真d, 我指的是當日的pageview 比平日高了一千, 而不是visit啊~ 而且亦不是說有一千個來自mingpao 的referal link 啦. 不如我再整細d 張相啦, 好冇? hang,
你睇真d, 我指的是當日的pageview 比平日高了一千, 而不是visit啊~
而且亦不是說有一千個來自mingpao 的referal link 啦.

不如我再整細d 張相啦, 好冇?

]]> By: poonwinghang http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-248041 poonwinghang Sun, 08 Apr 2007 19:11:33 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-248041 點解我無過千人由mingpao 黎？ 哈哈，不如cut 左我果part？我發現真係影得好差 點解我無過千人由mingpao 黎？
哈哈，不如cut 左我果part？我發現真係影得好差

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-248014 sidekick Sun, 08 Apr 2007 16:57:41 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-248014 <blockquote><a href="#comment-247825" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>aulina on 8/4/2007 at 4:12 pm said:</em></a> 你之前啲相都唔係咁樣嘅！呢張對女仔嚟講真係幾大打擊喎！</blockquote> 咁嚴重? 弊... :p 未至於好大打擊, 有點不開心就是了...

aulina on 8/4/2007 at 4:12 pm said:

你之前啲相都唔係咁樣嘅！呢張對女仔嚟講真係幾大打擊喎！

咁嚴重? 弊… :p
未至於好大打擊, 有點不開心就是了…

]]> By: 夜嵐 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247912 夜嵐 Sun, 08 Apr 2007 12:35:59 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247912 網上徵婚…想起這單東東… http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/4745108a010005ip 網上徵婚…想起這單東東…
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/4745108a010005ip

]]> By: aulina http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247825 aulina Sun, 08 Apr 2007 08:12:42 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247825 你之前啲相都唔係咁樣嘅！呢張對女仔嚟講真係幾大打擊喎！ 你之前啲相都唔係咁樣嘅！呢張對女仔嚟講真係幾大打擊喎！

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247772 sidekick Sun, 08 Apr 2007 02:39:26 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247772 Stannum, 我諗冇廿張都起碼有十張... :cry: 我覺得係做咁多次訪問最肉酸o既一次, 簡直令我對鏡頭o既恐懼大增... :!: Stannum,
我諗冇廿張都起碼有十張… :cry:
我覺得係做咁多次訪問最肉酸o既一次, 簡直令我對鏡頭o既恐懼大增… :!:

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247769 sidekick Sun, 08 Apr 2007 02:35:27 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247769 <blockquote><a href="#comment-247748" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>菜鳥 on 8/4/2007 at 9:26 am said:</em></a> 唔知講咩黎安慰你，節哀啦惟有....</blockquote> 謝謝你啊~ :cry:

菜鳥 on 8/4/2007 at 9:26 am said:

唔知講咩黎安慰你，節哀啦惟有….

謝謝你啊~ :cry:

]]> By: Stannum http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247760 Stannum Sun, 08 Apr 2007 02:07:28 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247760 <blockquote><a href="#comment-247684" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>sidekick on 8/4/2007 at 5:09 am said:</em></a> 影相o既唔係記者, 而係攝影師啊~ 我已經好懇切咁拜托攝影師大佬要對我仁慈一d, 儘量影得我好少少啦... 媽媽今日都問點解唔揀張好d o既相... 也許人家盡了力, 只是當事人實在長得太抱歉... 當然, 我唔係咁諗... :~~~</blockquote> 攝影師都影成咁﹖真係離譜﹗效果仲差過以前D用完即棄垃圾相機呀﹗其實佢影左幾多張呀﹖

sidekick on 8/4/2007 at 5:09 am said:
影相o既唔係記者, 而係攝影師啊~
我已經好懇切咁拜托攝影師大佬要對我仁慈一d, 儘量影得我好少少啦…
媽媽今日都問點解唔揀張好d o既相…
也許人家盡了力, 只是當事人實在長得太抱歉…
當然, 我唔係咁諗… :~~~

攝影師都影成咁﹖真係離譜﹗效果仲差過以前D用完即棄垃圾相機呀﹗其實佢影左幾多張呀﹖

]]> By: 菜鳥 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247748 菜鳥 Sun, 08 Apr 2007 01:26:48 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247748 唔知講咩黎安慰你，節哀啦惟有.... 唔知講咩黎安慰你，節哀啦惟有….

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247683 sidekick Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:05:35 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247683 <blockquote><a href="#comment-247629" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>hkmirage on 7/4/2007 at 11:01 pm said:</em></a> 我覺得 3 張相都是不夠光 :cry:</blockquote> 其他兩張我唔知, 我o個張其實夠光, 不過我寧願佢一係soft d, 一係爆d... 要隱惡揚善啊, 影得靚d, 揀d 好d o既相, 除o左對當事人, 亦係對讀者o既善事, 唔好虐待人家眼睛啦...

hkmirage on 7/4/2007 at 11:01 pm said:

我覺得 3 張相都是不夠光 :cry:

其他兩張我唔知, 我o個張其實夠光, 不過我寧願佢一係soft d, 一係爆d…
要隱惡揚善啊, 影得靚d, 揀d 好d o既相, 除o左對當事人, 亦係對讀者o既善事, 唔好虐待人家眼睛啦…

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247682 sidekick Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:02:45 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247682 <blockquote><a href="#comment-247607" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>Crystal on 7/4/2007 at 9:29 pm said:</em></a> 相比起阿hang果張,我覺得,你果張影得幾唔錯.</blockquote> 係呀, 杜麗、小心都話影得hang 唔好... 不過, 起碼細頭嘛... 你有冇見過報紙實物? 我放得上o黎, 當然整得冇咁清楚, 如果你睇真d, 你會知sidekick o個張有幾唔掂... :(

Crystal on 7/4/2007 at 9:29 pm said:

相比起阿hang果張,我覺得,你果張影得幾唔錯.

係呀, 杜麗、小心都話影得hang 唔好…
不過, 起碼細頭嘛…
你有冇見過報紙實物?
我放得上o黎, 當然整得冇咁清楚, 如果你睇真d, 你會知sidekick o個張有幾唔掂… :(

]]> By: hkmirage http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247629 hkmirage Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:01:04 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247629 我覺得 3 張相都是不夠光 :cry: 我覺得 3 張相都是不夠光 :cry:

]]> By: Crystal http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247607 Crystal Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:29:57 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247607 相比起阿hang果張,我覺得,你果張影得幾唔錯. 相比起阿hang果張,我覺得,你果張影得幾唔錯.

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247588 sidekick Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:41:59 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247588 遙, 咩都好, 循例多謝你一聲先~ :p 遙,
咩都好, 循例多謝你一聲先~
:p

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247587 sidekick Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:40:56 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247587 <blockquote><a href="#comment-247482" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>pig on 7/4/2007 at 10:09 am said:</em></a> 要徵婚就當然要搵張好D架啦，個記者都唔醒目少少:mad:</blockquote> 咪係, 真係大整蠱... :mad:

pig on 7/4/2007 at 10:09 am said:

要徵婚就當然要搵張好D架啦，個記者都唔醒目少少:mad:

咪係, 真係大整蠱… :mad:

]]> By: 遙 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247560 遙 Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:03:58 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247560 無問題啊，幾好睇喎！ 乜有問題咩？ 我覺得好吸引喎！ 如果因為呢張相影響到您將來感情的發展，儘管告訴我…… 我替您分擔。(哈！自己都覺得好廢喎！) 無問題啊，幾好睇喎！
乜有問題咩？
我覺得好吸引喎！
如果因為呢張相影響到您將來感情的發展，儘管告訴我……

我替您分擔。(哈！自己都覺得好廢喎！)

]]> By: pig http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247482 pig Sat, 07 Apr 2007 02:09:43 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247482 要徵婚就當然要搵張好D架啦，個記者都唔醒目少少:mad: 要徵婚就當然要搵張好D架啦，個記者都唔醒目少少:mad:

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247475 sidekick Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:31:18 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247475 <blockquote><a href="#comment-247468" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>木偶 on 7/4/2007 at 9:22 am said:</em></a> 公園仔那張是自己指定的嗎? 他那張是最好的, Hang是第一次見, 而你那張真的不像你喎~</blockquote> 我猜沒有指定這回事吧? 如果可以自己揀相, 我打死都唔會出呢張啦... 我都覺得公園仔o個張最好, 又有貓, 又有型, 好羨慕! :eek: 同埋, 朱凱迪o個張都好得o架, 我冇放上o黎, 但有放上flickr~

木偶 on 7/4/2007 at 9:22 am said:

公園仔那張是自己指定的嗎? 他那張是最好的, Hang是第一次見, 而你那張真的不像你喎~

我猜沒有指定這回事吧?
如果可以自己揀相, 我打死都唔會出呢張啦…
我都覺得公園仔o個張最好, 又有貓, 又有型, 好羨慕! :eek:

同埋, 朱凱迪o個張都好得o架, 我冇放上o黎, 但有放上flickr~

]]> By: sidekick http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247473 sidekick Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:28:16 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247473 <blockquote><a href="#comment-247467" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>星屑醫生 on 7/4/2007 at 9:21 am said:</em></a> 我倒覺得你的相幾ok, 反而公園仔和阿鏗雙雙托腮, 更搞笑.</blockquote> 我應該托埋一份嘛... :p 你唔明o架喇~ 你覺得ok, 係因為o係你眼中, 我係咁上下醜樣, 但o係我眼中, 我唔知/唔認為自己係咁醜樣, 於是覺得好醜樣囉... :cry:

星屑醫生 on 7/4/2007 at 9:21 am said:

我倒覺得你的相幾ok, 反而公園仔和阿鏗雙雙托腮, 更搞笑.

我應該托埋一份嘛… :p
你唔明o架喇~
你覺得ok, 係因為o係你眼中, 我係咁上下醜樣, 但o係我眼中, 我唔知/唔認為自己係咁醜樣, 於是覺得好醜樣囉… :cry:

]]> By: 木偶 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247468 木偶 Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:22:32 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247468 公園仔那張是自己指定的嗎? 他那張是最好的, Hang是第一次見, 而你那張真的不像你喎~ 公園仔那張是自己指定的嗎? 他那張是最好的, Hang是第一次見, 而你那張真的不像你喎~

]]> By: 星屑醫生 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/comment-page-1#comment-247467 星屑醫生 Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:21:47 +0000 http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2007/04/07/1001/#comment-247467 我倒覺得你的相幾ok, 反而公園仔和阿鏗雙雙托腮, 更搞笑. 我倒覺得你的相幾ok, 反而公園仔和阿鏗雙雙托腮, 更搞笑.

]]>