<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog文化？主流媒體的食古不化！</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511</link>
	<description>以前的事，無人記念；將來的事，後來的人也不追憶。</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-261944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-261944</guid>
		<description>可能不是他們不想吸收, 而是跟不上社會的變化了.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>可能不是他們不想吸收, 而是跟不上社會的變化了.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 阿盈</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-212627</link>
		<dc:creator>阿盈</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-212627</guid>
		<description>那些媒體人的年紀太大了，吸收不了新的事物 =_=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>那些媒體人的年紀太大了，吸收不了新的事物 =_=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just a Sidekick&#8230;&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2005香港Blog事回顧</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-70056</link>
		<dc:creator>Just a Sidekick&#8230;&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2005香港Blog事回顧</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-70056</guid>
		<description>[...] 　 Sidekick 的相關文章： Blog文化？主流媒體的食古不化！ BLOG＞網上日記(2)  尊重原創，推廣良好Blog 文化 討論：轉載文章、連結、圖片、音樂的指引 關於12.4大遊行海報設計 　 延伸閱讀： hk_blog_discuss @ del.icio.us 聞.見.思.錄：新增點：Blog熱潮 (blog is blog 緣起)Moliuology：網誌三國時代 爛兔記：三個BSP 三個定位 Also Sprach Blacksnow：抄襲風波停不了 世界盡頭： 這本來就是個兩難嗎?     &#124;  &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 　 Sidekick 的相關文章： Blog文化？主流媒體的食古不化！ BLOG＞網上日記(2)  尊重原創，推廣良好Blog 文化 討論：轉載文章、連結、圖片、音樂的指引 關於12.4大遊行海報設計 　 延伸閱讀： hk_blog_discuss @ del.icio.us 聞.見.思.錄：新增點：Blog熱潮 (blog is blog 緣起)Moliuology：網誌三國時代 爛兔記：三個BSP 三個定位 Also Sprach Blacksnow：抄襲風波停不了 世界盡頭： 這本來就是個兩難嗎?     |  | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emptyconcept.net  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; 什麼是Blog？ - Blog的由來和《新增點》</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-18928</link>
		<dc:creator>emptyconcept.net  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; 什麼是Blog？ - Blog的由來和《新增點》</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-18928</guid>
		<description>[...] ��。 	感謝Alex和Sidekick上載了節目內容，大家可到Alex的 聞.見.思.錄和 Sidekick 那兒下載有關節目，並詳細閱讀有關討論。 	節目主� [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ��。 	感謝Alex和Sidekick上載了節目內容，大家可到Alex的 聞.見.思.錄和 Sidekick 那兒下載有關節目，並詳細閱讀有關討論。 	節目主� [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dukedom of Aberdeen 香港仔公國  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; 被誤解的Blog文化</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-18419</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dukedom of Aberdeen 香港仔公國  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; 被誤解的Blog文化</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 06:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-18419</guid>
		<description>[...] o.us tag: hk&#095;blog&#095;discuss Alex Chow：新增點：Blog熱潮／續談Blog 小踢：Blog文化？主流媒體的食古不化！ 瘋腿：新增點：Blog熱潮 Stannum：【所感 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] o.us tag: hk&#95;blog&#95;discuss Alex Chow：新增點：Blog熱潮／續談Blog 小踢：Blog文化？主流媒體的食古不化！ 瘋腿：新增點：Blog熱潮 Stannum：【所感 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog of Roy Chan &#187; 《新增點》的 Blog</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-16783</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog of Roy Chan &#187; 《新增點》的 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 03:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-16783</guid>
		<description>[...] og &#8212; voidoo @ 4:12  	 	 		因為CableTV的《新增點》對Blog的報導引來香港blog界的熱烈討論。上週看完節目後本來也想插幾句，但看到一大堆「狠� [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] og &#8212; voidoo @ 4:12  	 	 		因為CableTV的《新增點》對Blog的報導引來香港blog界的熱烈討論。上週看完節目後本來也想插幾句，但看到一大堆「狠� [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Miao - 喵格子</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-15973</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Miao - 喵格子</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 14:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-15973</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;blog的定義&lt;/strong&gt;

今天偶然與朋友在MSN上聊天，順便介紹他去自己的blog上逛逛。沒想到他一頭霧水的回答：什麼是blog？這個問題，讓我想了許久。是啊，從一開始在pchome的明日報到現在，三年來我使用blog來記...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>blog的定義</strong></p>
<p>今天偶然與朋友在MSN上聊天，順便介紹他去自己的blog上逛逛。沒想到他一頭霧水的回答：什麼是blog？這個問題，讓我想了許久。是啊，從一開始在pchome的明日報到現在，三年來我使用blog來記&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 天佑的自由天地  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; blog 不只是「網上日記」？</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-15866</link>
		<dc:creator>天佑的自由天地  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; blog 不只是「網上日記」？</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 03:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-15866</guid>
		<description>[...] ? blogger 的我說出來好像有點班門弄斧，但都想說一說自己的看法． 	 Blog文化？主流媒體的食古不化！ 	BLOG＞網上日記 	我這小天地是 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ? blogger 的我說出來好像有點班門弄斧，但都想說一說自己的看法． 	 Blog文化？主流媒體的食古不化！ 	BLOG＞網上日記 	我這小天地是 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog等於網上日記？</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-15687</link>
		<dc:creator>William&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog等於網上日記？</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 19:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-15687</guid>
		<description>[...] ��了有關Blog的新聞。 有線定義了Blog就等於是網上日記， 有點狹義。 這裡有很多資料。 正如其他人的Blog說的一樣， 簡單一點到Google大神找� [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ��了有關Blog的新聞。 有線定義了Blog就等於是網上日記， 有點狹義。 這裡有很多資料。 正如其他人的Blog說的一樣， 簡單一點到Google大神找� [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 查理王.看世界-部落格-CHARLIE'S BLOG!</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-15474</link>
		<dc:creator>查理王.看世界-部落格-CHARLIE'S BLOG!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 16:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-15474</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;【誌謝與建議】RE：（哲斌兄）優格推薦 小報告第一回【BLOG‧部落格百尺竿頭】&lt;/strong&gt;

今天一大早，翻閱完《中國時報》後，慣性地延著《查理王.看世界blog》首頁邊欄的rss新聞欄位點進《中時電子報》探尋在書面印刷報紙所遺漏的”美好”。不假</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>【誌謝與建議】RE：（哲斌兄）優格推薦 小報告第一回【BLOG‧部落格百尺竿頭】</strong></p>
<p>今天一大早，翻閱完《中國時報》後，慣性地延著《查理王.看世界blog》首頁邊欄的rss新聞欄位點進《中時電子報》探尋在書面印刷報紙所遺漏的”美好”。不假</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 愛花</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-14855</link>
		<dc:creator>愛花</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 18:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14855</guid>
		<description>這正是我想說的.

以偏蓋全地用 MSN 代表了 IM, 
似乎當 icq, qq, yahoo messager 都係死 o既...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>這正是我想說的.</p>
<p>以偏蓋全地用 MSN 代表了 IM,<br />
似乎當 icq, qq, yahoo messager 都係死 o既&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan's Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-14854</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan's Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 17:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14854</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>观点可怜的新增点</strong></p>
<p>Jan真是后知后觉，加上反应迟缓。上周在Alex及Sidekick的Blog上都看过有有关有线电视新闻一台节目《新增点》有关Blog的讨论，但到了今天晚上才有机会从Alex的Blog上下载片段来收看。 看过之后.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-2#comment-14739</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 21:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14739</guid>
		<description>Edmond and all, 上面那個, 是有心人造的blog, 讓你在上面post文, 來試自已的blog的trackback 及pingback用的!
而我, 終於找到原因了~ 是因為某個plugin的問題~~
我關掉了好些plugin, (不過未知是哪一個令我不能被trackback 及pingback)
:p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edmond and all, 上面那個, 是有心人造的blog, 讓你在上面post文, 來試自已的blog的trackback 及pingback用的!<br />
而我, 終於找到原因了~ 是因為某個plugin的問題~~<br />
我關掉了好些plugin, (不過未知是哪一個令我不能被trackback 及pingback)<br />
:p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Test Track  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; test</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14737</link>
		<dc:creator>Test Track  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 21:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14737</guid>
		<description>[...] 		 							test  						 						Monday, May 2nd, 2005 at 8:30 pm by TT  						 						 								test  						 					 						 														Trackback &#124; 							 Permalink 							   							 Filed u [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 		 							test  						 						Monday, May 2nd, 2005 at 8:30 pm by TT  						 						 								test  						 					 						 														Trackback | 							 Permalink 							   							 Filed u [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edmond Hui</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14730</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmond Hui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14730</guid>
		<description>oh... it&#039;s ok. I just keep forget you can ping, but can&#039;t receive ping.... BTW, my suspection on the problem is some apache redirection problem in your blog (maybe .htaccess??) hope it helps you debug. I click the tb link and it reload to itself..... (try my and you will see what I mean) I can&#039;t wait to see one of the coolest HK bloggers can blog like it should be. The fun way. :mrgreen: 

cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh&#8230; it&#8217;s ok. I just keep forget you can ping, but can&#8217;t receive ping&#8230;. BTW, my suspection on the problem is some apache redirection problem in your blog (maybe .htaccess??) hope it helps you debug. I click the tb link and it reload to itself&#8230;.. (try my and you will see what I mean) I can&#8217;t wait to see one of the coolest HK bloggers can blog like it should be. The fun way. <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14729</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 19:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14729</guid>
		<description>Edmond，我的blog，可以trackback人，不可被trackback，死因不明... :cry:
不過，我有technorati, 有site meter, 有bloglines, 所以, 如果你&quot;link過我&quot;, 就算不人手trackback, 我也是會知道的...
暫時只能如此了...
令你及其他blogger不便, 對不起~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edmond，我的blog，可以trackback人，不可被trackback，死因不明&#8230; <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_cry.gif' alt=':cry:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
不過，我有technorati, 有site meter, 有bloglines, 所以, 如果你&#8221;link過我&#8221;, 就算不人手trackback, 我也是會知道的&#8230;<br />
暫時只能如此了&#8230;<br />
令你及其他blogger不便, 對不起~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edmond Hui</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14728</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmond Hui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 19:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14728</guid>
		<description>hey sidekick,

look like you trackback url didn&#039;t work???

I see above &quot;trackback&quot; has a URI of http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/trackback/ but when I kick it reload to the same page??? it should be giving me an error, from the trackback API point of view??? something broken again??? :que:

Once again, sorry for my techno bubble.....

BTW, I have no problem pinging http://blog.age.com.hk/archives/216, which duke is using wp too.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey sidekick,</p>
<p>look like you trackback url didn&#8217;t work???</p>
<p>I see above &#8220;trackback&#8221; has a URI of <a href="http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/trackback/" rel="nofollow">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/trackback/</a> but when I kick it reload to the same page??? it should be giving me an error, from the trackback API point of view??? something broken again??? :que:</p>
<p>Once again, sorry for my techno bubble&#8230;..</p>
<p>BTW, I have no problem pinging <a href="http://blog.age.com.hk/archives/216" rel="nofollow">http://blog.age.com.hk/archives/216</a>, which duke is using wp too&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edmond Hui</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14727</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmond Hui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 19:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14727</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t know why my tb ping didn work here again... :que:
http://edmondhui.homeip.net/blog/item/620

http://edmondhui.homeip.net/blog/item/619</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t know why my tb ping didn work here again&#8230; :que:<br />
<a href="http://edmondhui.homeip.net/blog/item/620" rel="nofollow">http://edmondhui.homeip.net/blog/item/620</a></p>
<p><a href="http://edmondhui.homeip.net/blog/item/619" rel="nofollow">http://edmondhui.homeip.net/blog/item/619</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Chan</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14562</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 22:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14562</guid>
		<description>我唔會同個客或老細提我有個 blog, 原因亦同佢地係咪認為 blog 係細路玩意無關，雖則我同朋友講我日日 hacking。:evil: 其實 xxx.cxn 時期，我度過 blog 社群既 proposal, 畫埋 database design ，不過本著大公司自保精神，一直都只係個 HD 度 。:lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我唔會同個客或老細提我有個 blog, 原因亦同佢地係咪認為 blog 係細路玩意無關，雖則我同朋友講我日日 hacking。:evil: 其實 xxx.cxn 時期，我度過 blog 社群既 proposal, 畫埋 database design ，不過本著大公司自保精神，一直都只係個 HD 度 。:lol:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14559</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 20:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14559</guid>
		<description>你有&quot;包拗頸&quot;咩? 唔覺o番? :)
相反, 你講的, 我大部份同意~ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>你有&#8221;包拗頸&#8221;咩? 唔覺o番? <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
相反, 你講的, 我大部份同意~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Chan</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14556</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 20:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14556</guid>
		<description>人肉trackback:
http://blog.xychen.org/archives/2005/05/02/blogging/

包拗頸的回應 :grin:

P.S. 敵敵，你平均每日花幾多時間寫blog架... 點解可以寫得咁密架!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>人肉trackback:<br />
<a href="http://blog.xychen.org/archives/2005/05/02/blogging/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.xychen.org/archives/2005/05/02/blogging/</a></p>
<p>包拗頸的回應 <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>P.S. 敵敵，你平均每日花幾多時間寫blog架&#8230; 點解可以寫得咁密架!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stackey</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14543</link>
		<dc:creator>stackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 18:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14543</guid>
		<description>這類節目本來就不是講什麼意思，唉，這就是所謂主流力量，所謂大勢 … :eek:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>這類節目本來就不是講什麼意思，唉，這就是所謂主流力量，所謂大勢 … <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_smile.gif' alt=':eek:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14541</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 18:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14541</guid>
		<description>STACKEY, 　我覺得始作俑者是突破啦！因為調查時，已定性了網上日記僅限於那類的網上日記，寫網上日記的又是那個年齡層，然後再將其定為＝BLOG，於是電視節目就跟著此方向......
最慘的，是電視節目的被訪者梁文道、領男他們，既然節目想講的只是某一類的網上日記，又何苦要這班被訪者？不如多訪問Xanga 的學生會員，讓他們說說少年心底夢，或訪問一下突破的代表，講講這個調查結果還有意思！:idea:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STACKEY, 　我覺得始作俑者是突破啦！因為調查時，已定性了網上日記僅限於那類的網上日記，寫網上日記的又是那個年齡層，然後再將其定為＝BLOG，於是電視節目就跟著此方向&#8230;&#8230;<br />
最慘的，是電視節目的被訪者梁文道、領男他們，既然節目想講的只是某一類的網上日記，又何苦要這班被訪者？不如多訪問Xanga 的學生會員，讓他們說說少年心底夢，或訪問一下突破的代表，講講這個調查結果還有意思！:idea:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Middle</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14540</link>
		<dc:creator>Middle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 18:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14540</guid>
		<description>哎，我不否認有些也很有趣，有些依然繼續表達真我，看得人觸動心弦。但普遍來說，真的較悶呢。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>哎，我不否認有些也很有趣，有些依然繼續表達真我，看得人觸動心弦。但普遍來說，真的較悶呢。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14539</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 17:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14539</guid>
		<description>Middle, 謝謝留言! :)
你說“如果這些真是日記的話，恕我直言，又會「精彩」到那裡去?”＜－那也不一定的！如國內很出名的木子美，她的日記，相當精彩！
香港的例子也不少，例如我友ukjoe, tungpo, pk_ 等等！
（我BLOG上的my-link有他們的連結）</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Middle, 謝謝留言! <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
你說“如果這些真是日記的話，恕我直言，又會「精彩」到那裡去?”＜－那也不一定的！如國內很出名的木子美，她的日記，相當精彩！<br />
香港的例子也不少，例如我友ukjoe, tungpo, pk_ 等等！<br />
（我BLOG上的my-link有他們的連結）</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekick</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14538</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 17:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14538</guid>
		<description>布偶, 因為我寫的大部份都不是網上日記, 所以我不願意人家當我的blog只是日記!
但網上日記好算是blog的一種, 喜歡寫日記的, 便繼續寫日記, 那也很好!
當然, 亦不存在&quot;網上日記&quot;是否高帽的問題, 如果, 如你所言, 就算日記被定性為日記文學, 我也不會因而喜歡!
我自由我道, 我只打算blog我的blog, 寫/記我喜歡的事, 亦不打算負起甚麼將甚麼推到史無前例的地位的責任!
:grin:
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>布偶, 因為我寫的大部份都不是網上日記, 所以我不願意人家當我的blog只是日記!<br />
但網上日記好算是blog的一種, 喜歡寫日記的, 便繼續寫日記, 那也很好!<br />
當然, 亦不存在&#8221;網上日記&#8221;是否高帽的問題, 如果, 如你所言, 就算日記被定性為日記文學, 我也不會因而喜歡!<br />
我自由我道, 我只打算blog我的blog, 寫/記我喜歡的事, 亦不打算負起甚麼將甚麼推到史無前例的地位的責任!<br />
 <img src='http://sidekick.myblog.hk/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/default/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aahsun</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14536</link>
		<dc:creator>aahsun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 17:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14536</guid>
		<description>sidekick,

in a way, it is about the misunderstanding of blogs, and the lack of research done by the mainstream tv programme producers. yet, it also tells how our society (hong Kong) sees technology, or computing tools and youth cutlure. i mean the event also tells what hong kong is in a way, but throught what they did (so badly) but the ways they did and the ways of thinking they have.

i think it is very interesting to view that way. in their discourse, technology has to be reduced to something &quot;useful&quot; like how social workers would help to solve the &quot;problems.&quot; the use of technology is viewed as something &quot;practical&quot; as any tool for teachers, social workers, parents to &quot;fix&quot; problems of the youth. like the absurdity of the original sin, technology becomes the stupid magic of prayers to &quot;solve&quot; problems and save us from something that we never never commit wrong. 

for me, blogs is diary, IT SIMPLY IS. YET, we should view them in a different way, and use them in a different way. what i mean is the problem of the tv programme is not about blog is just dairy, but how they define dairy. 

it could be dairy, and yet also political criticism, or cultural observations, or creative writings and other art form ( i am working on my sound blog, which is sound art project). IT IS diary but it functions differently. and it could be not just diary when people &quot;gather&quot; together, it forms political ground for empowering, and for request for changes, though i still think the most important thing about blog is from the very personal to write upon our society and the world, basically auto-ethnographic. 

this is what i am working on the research paper actually. 

thanks for everything you have done on the blogging cutlure in hong kong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sidekick,</p>
<p>in a way, it is about the misunderstanding of blogs, and the lack of research done by the mainstream tv programme producers. yet, it also tells how our society (hong Kong) sees technology, or computing tools and youth cutlure. i mean the event also tells what hong kong is in a way, but throught what they did (so badly) but the ways they did and the ways of thinking they have.</p>
<p>i think it is very interesting to view that way. in their discourse, technology has to be reduced to something &#8220;useful&#8221; like how social workers would help to solve the &#8220;problems.&#8221; the use of technology is viewed as something &#8220;practical&#8221; as any tool for teachers, social workers, parents to &#8220;fix&#8221; problems of the youth. like the absurdity of the original sin, technology becomes the stupid magic of prayers to &#8220;solve&#8221; problems and save us from something that we never never commit wrong. </p>
<p>for me, blogs is diary, IT SIMPLY IS. YET, we should view them in a different way, and use them in a different way. what i mean is the problem of the tv programme is not about blog is just dairy, but how they define dairy. </p>
<p>it could be dairy, and yet also political criticism, or cultural observations, or creative writings and other art form ( i am working on my sound blog, which is sound art project). IT IS diary but it functions differently. and it could be not just diary when people &#8220;gather&#8221; together, it forms political ground for empowering, and for request for changes, though i still think the most important thing about blog is from the very personal to write upon our society and the world, basically auto-ethnographic. </p>
<p>this is what i am working on the research paper actually. </p>
<p>thanks for everything you have done on the blogging cutlure in hong kong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stackey</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14532</link>
		<dc:creator>stackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 16:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14532</guid>
		<description>無聊想，那個節目大談blog只是日記是沒辦法的事，整個issue的過程是xanga (大多為寫日記用的) 潮爆香港，因為潮爆，i-cable製作了這節目，製作人怎麼會說blog不是日記？這是一個順理成章的過程，實在生氣也沒用 … 不過，明顯i-cable低估了，甚至沒想過其言論帶來的回響:roll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>無聊想，那個節目大談blog只是日記是沒辦法的事，整個issue的過程是xanga (大多為寫日記用的) 潮爆香港，因為潮爆，i-cable製作了這節目，製作人怎麼會說blog不是日記？這是一個順理成章的過程，實在生氣也沒用 … 不過，明顯i-cable低估了，甚至沒想過其言論帶來的回響:roll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Middle</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14523</link>
		<dc:creator>Middle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 15:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14523</guid>
		<description>剛巧我也想到這個問題，而想了一個故事......

所謂blog，是一個發佈平台，但要怎樣用它是其主人的自由。就我個人眼見，香港的潮流是網上日記那一類。不過以我個人的觀念，日記是私人的、不會讓其他人看到的，因為那是收藏我內心世界最深處的一些思想或感情。我會在那裡，把我平時不會對人說但我又想說的東西，記錄在內，讓它們不致被我遺忘。可現在流行的，卻是把日記公開。但其內容及深度，我相信一定不及以往年代的「日記」。因為，公開的東西，一定有所保留；而一個只記一個人的日常生活瑣事而又有所保留的地方。如果這些真是日記的話，恕我直言，又會「精彩」到那裡去? (我承認，我是八卦的 XD)

不過，我並不否定網上日記。始終，在不傷害人的前提下，每個人都可以選擇自己的表達或表現方式。我想，不是每一個年青人(甚至成年人)也有著一些不知所以的深度內涵經歷去修飾自己(笑)。讓他們用這種方式去表達自己，也許更有助他們與人溝通，甚至練習一下寫作技巧呢。 ~__~

但要令blog 這種東西在本地發揚光大、脫離只是網上日記這個區域，我相信，不是短期內說可便可的事。那需要的是，大家的努力與醒覺。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>剛巧我也想到這個問題，而想了一個故事&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>所謂blog，是一個發佈平台，但要怎樣用它是其主人的自由。就我個人眼見，香港的潮流是網上日記那一類。不過以我個人的觀念，日記是私人的、不會讓其他人看到的，因為那是收藏我內心世界最深處的一些思想或感情。我會在那裡，把我平時不會對人說但我又想說的東西，記錄在內，讓它們不致被我遺忘。可現在流行的，卻是把日記公開。但其內容及深度，我相信一定不及以往年代的「日記」。因為，公開的東西，一定有所保留；而一個只記一個人的日常生活瑣事而又有所保留的地方。如果這些真是日記的話，恕我直言，又會「精彩」到那裡去? (我承認，我是八卦的 XD)</p>
<p>不過，我並不否定網上日記。始終，在不傷害人的前提下，每個人都可以選擇自己的表達或表現方式。我想，不是每一個年青人(甚至成年人)也有著一些不知所以的深度內涵經歷去修飾自己(笑)。讓他們用這種方式去表達自己，也許更有助他們與人溝通，甚至練習一下寫作技巧呢。 ~__~</p>
<p>但要令blog 這種東西在本地發揚光大、脫離只是網上日記這個區域，我相信，不是短期內說可便可的事。那需要的是，大家的努力與醒覺。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 世界盡頭A</title>
		<link>http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511/comment-page-1#comment-14505</link>
		<dc:creator>世界盡頭A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 13:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidekick.myblog.hk/archives/2005/04/30/511#comment-14505</guid>
		<description>看過節目後，覺得想到要做這個節目的人（製作人？節目監督）屁股該打，罪在（1）APPROVE或（2）以為齋出條好橋就算，其實造瀾條橋才叫人可惜。:eek:
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>看過節目後，覺得想到要做這個節目的人（製作人？節目監督）屁股該打，罪在（1）APPROVE或（2）以為齋出條好橋就算，其實造瀾條橋才叫人可惜。:eek:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

